Sunday 30 March 2014



*PowerPoint is the Teachers Bread and Butter*



This week I shall present Microsoft Powerpoint as my idea of the best tool for teachers.  I understand some teachers notion that, as one has put to me, ‘Power Point has been done to death’  (meaning it has been used so much that it has been overused and has become boring to the students); however I do not think there is any escaping PowerPoint's dominance in teaching.  It is the only tool that one could say is the ‘bread and butter’ of teaching (meaning that it is the tool teachers use for presentations).  Even the teacher who made the ‘done-to-death’ remark, old and wise as he was, did actually use PowerPoint in his presentation to us.  If you are a teacher, it is most likely that you will need to be proficient in PowerPoint or an equivalent program that does the same functions (more on a tool that can do this in the final paragraph).  






During our five weeks of this Graduate Diploma all of our tutorials and lectures have been presented with a PowerPoint type of slide show (given that other companies have their equivalent of PowerPoint technology).  This is an example of how widely used PowerPoint is at our own university.  Most of the PowerPoints have been used in the old fashioned ‘chalk and talk’ method where the written words are put on screen and the tutor in-person narrates the slides.  This may display a lack of skills in Powerpoint; however, I have noticed that when a background is put on the slides they become harder to read.  Personally, I intend to become an expert in Powerpoint.  I have not used it before this unit of study, which started only five weeks ago, but I can already see the benefits of knowing how it works.  I am surprised to learn that it has so many features other than the text-on-screen that we students see with our tutorials.  The user is able to: put a narration onto the slide show and can make the slide show start and advance automatically, or have the slide show advance by the users command; video can be embedded in the slide show; animations can be put into the slide show; an interactive quiz can be put in; photos and clip art.  Powerpoint is a very powerful tool.






PowerPoint also allows high order thinking, in the parlance of Blooms taxonomy.  Students can be tasked to put a PowerPoint show together with some basic training.  This has been displayed in this weeks subject readings for ICT in Learning Design, on the Universities ‘moodle’ site, where classes have put together a virtual museum.  It seems the name, virtual museum, is rather flexible and can mean all sorts of educational presentations.  The ones on the web site, a link here (http://christykeeler.com/EducationalVirtualMuseums.html), are to do with American culture and history.  What a great resource if an Australian museum sites could be made by school students!  It would be a very relaxing way to review Australian culture and history and have great benefits to education of students and the general public alike.  Although PowerPoint is not a web 2.0 tool, students are still able to work on PowerPoint individually, or in groups, and develop presentations in accordance with a scaffold given by the teacher.  Students are able to work within Blooms (1956) cognitive processes of remember, understand, apply, analyse, evaluate, create.  Teachers are still able to be ‘Learning Managers’ and allow the students to explore their own learning with supervision.  


images.jpg

Figure 1: Bloom's cognitive processes.


SUBSTITUTION
  • ·         White board/black board
  • ·         Speaker when narration used
  • ·         In-person presentation when used over internet
  • ·         Old style film slides
  • ·         Old style printed pictures
AUGMENTATION
  • ·         Of presentation
  • ·         Audience participation (quizzes, etc.)
  • ·         Send via email and web page
MODIFICATION
  • ·         Photo’s
  • ·         Movies
  • ·         Animation
  • ·         Quiz
REDEFINITION
  • ·         Glogster
  • ·         Prezi
  • ·         Webpage
  • ·         Slideshow
  • Movie Maker/Video presentation (where the video is a set of narrated stills).

Figure 2.  SAMR chart for Power Point.




Figure 2 is the SAMR chart for this weeks topic of Microsoft PowerPoint.  SAMR, as shown above, stands for Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, and Redefinition.  It is a tool used for analysing a subject and, in this course, replaces other tools such as SWOT.  What do we learn from the chart?  In the first row, Substitution, we explore that PowerPoint replaces the old-style slide shows that we older people remember: film slides, put into a light projector, used to throw a large image onto the screen.  I can still remember slideshows used during my own university education that were just like the PowerPoint presentations of today.  People who have not experienced slides will likely have grandparents with film slides of photographs.  Keeping with Substitution in the SAMR chart above, PowerPoint also replaces the black-board and white board; it appears that teachers now use their text on walls exclusively with PowerPoint.  This has the advantage to the teacher that it can be saved and used from year to year; and also with behavioural management because the teacher spends less time with their back to the classroom.  PowerPoint can also completely substitute the teacher or lecturer with a narrated slide show.  This has advantages to distance education and with my own course, which is largely completely on-line even though I am a resident student.


In the Argumentation section of the SAMR model, a dot-point I would like to expand on would be audience participation.  PowerPoint can be interactive with quizzes or questions.  This makes it a more powerful learning device.


Skipping to Redefinition on the SAMR model, some expansion on the dot-points would be helpful.  With the opinion of the teacher that said ‘PowerPoint has been done to death’, mentioned earlier, alternatives such as movie maker were suggested.  An example of a movie maker presentation was shown to my class: this was a set of stills narrated with a sound-track.  This type of presentation can also be done with PowerPoint -- I therefore do not think it is a worthy substitution for PowerPoint.  Regarding the Glogster, I have viewed some examples of Glogster on the web and think they are nothing more than a tidied up web page: they seem to have all the same features and functions of a web page.  Regarding Prezi, this is a worthy competitor to PowerPoint and may catch-on in the future.  It seems to do all the same functions capable of PowerPoint and, in addition, able to zoom in on parts of the slide.  If really needing to zoom on PowerPoint, prior preparation would allow you to put in extra slides of the would-be zoomed photograph, if that is what was needed.  The fact that Prezi works from the ‘cloud’ and allows this zooming makes it a very interesting presentation tool.





As can be seen, with my limited knowledge on presentation and presentation tools, I think PowerPoint is what every teacher needs to know thoroughly.  It is the basic tool of presentations.  Prezi seems to come a close second, in my opinion.  PowerPoint may develop further, however, and outclass Prezi.  There are also other programs that are free that have (to my knowledge) the tools of PowerPoint, such as Google Slides.  Google may, in fact, overtake Microsoft with its free programs.  PowerPoint is the program of choice for teachers and that does not seem likely to change in the immediate future.


Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.


Image of Bloom’s Cognitive Process from,

www.tidec.org

Friday 28 March 2014



This is my Literacy and Numeracy in Secondary Assessment Task 1.  It is still in draft form.  Leave a comment if you think it is a pass. David.

PS Does not seem the sound track works.  The original is narrated.  David.

Friday 21 March 2014

Reflection 3 Week 4 ICT for Learning Design David Grimshaw

Reflection 3 Week 4

ICT LEARNING DESIGN (GDLT)


Flickr Exploration


Picture 1. Rachel Carson, famous scientist.

To demonstrate that I have explored Flikr, and have an account with them, as required this week, I have downloaded this photo off the "commons".  Not all the photos of famous twentieth century scientists are on Flikr "commons": I was unable to find James Lovelock, inventor of the Gaia theory; Tim Flannery, prominent Australian scientist and author of Future Eaters; James Watson or Francis Crick, discoverers of DNA.  That demonstrates to me that the "commons" is still in its infantcy with its photo library. I remember another good web-site, Wikipedia, was also the same in its infantcy in 1996. This photo is of Rachel Carson, author of one the most famous science books in history: Silent Spring,1962.  The photo seems to be from 1951 when she wrote The Sea Around Us.  I also explored other sites on Flickr, such as the Queensland Library;  they have historical photos of Queensland on Flickr's "commons".



Figure 1.  Concept map of using mulitmedia.  Use in classrooms

Photos and Videos

It was our task to only unpack one of the media types between Photos, Videos, and Podcasts.  I am unable to adequately write a decent length on one of these.  Images and video are closely linked in their pedagogy techniques that I have wrote briefly on both.  Images (photos) can be used in movie-maker, for example, to create a slide show with narration and therefore have similar outcomes to video.  When viewing the benefits of images in the reading materials one can draw the same outcomes for video.

<Note to marker: A video was made with all the text read out on the track, but blogger will not upload it. It is a WMA file and it seems that blogger won't support it. I am unable to save it in a different format. More about this needs to be discussed in class. I cannot find a help link for blogger. A ridiculous amount of time has gone into this blog. As mentioned before, I just cannot continue this way: the other subjects are suffering too much.>


Photos.  Images are a good way of giving information.  They are static, allowing you to explore the whole image thoroughly rather than concentrating on the central object/character in a movie.  Being static also allows you to study the photo while it is being explained to you.  As shown in Stransbury (2008) (required reading this week) when the image is combined with words close to the picture, learning gains are beneficial; pictures with narrative are better.  A series of still images can tell a story very well.  Historically, not everything has been filmed due to the monetary cost of film movies; and, indeed, even a olden-days still camera was used sparingly due to the cost of developing film.   Taking pictures was expensive! That is why, in my experience, older people only have a small amount of photos of their youth and unless they had photography as a hobby, have very little photos in total compared to their digital camera days.




Figure1: Good quality film camera of the old days.
(https://www.google.com.au/search?q=35mm+movie+camera&espv=210&es_sm=93&tbm=isch&imgil=pDsDem99ZymuFM%253A%253Bhttps%253A%252F%252Fencrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com%252Fimages%253Fq%253Dtbn%253AANd9GcQ4wLw3afxVuMp1hSxyI1RctZupNp1_qLk-svr9pne0dfKnZEh7Fg%253B500%253B492%253BSlnn35Jd7AzS1M%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fpetapixel.com%25252F2011%25252F12%25252F07%25252Fstar-wars-movie-camera-auctioned-for-a-record-setting-625000%25252F&source=iu&usg=__KCp6HwotAT_XUxs_HU1yG7yCmRM%3D&sa=X&ei=-YArU7mhJNKbiQfkp4CIDA&ved=0CEIQ9QEwBA#facrc=_&imgdii=_&imgrc=pDsDem99ZymuFM%253A%3BSlnn35Jd7AzS1M%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fpetapixel.com%252Fassets%252Fuploads%252F2011%252F12%252Fstarwars_mini.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fpetapixel.com%252F2011%252F12%252F07%252Fstar-wars-movie-camera-auctioned-for-a-record-setting-625000%252F%3B500%3B492)





Picture 2 :  Film used inside camera’s to take an image.  Film had the costs of purchase and developing.
(https://www.google.com.au/search?q=film+35mm&espv=210&es_sm=93&tbm=isch&imgil=RyUFNkP2nlaesM%253A%253Bhttps%253A%252F%252Fencrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com%252Fimages%253Fq%253Dtbn%253AANd9GcSO1vkgumWK1WuRcm17R97BJJmrx000Sn5ZJBjK9Qb5YKl9mVBBUA%253B4291%253B1720%253BTSOBIkafmn4R4M%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.thegiggity.com%25252Farticle.php%25253Farticle%2525253Dwhy-is-your-screen-169&source=iu&usg=__CbYW8FuWQjvGX0DZcAuEgmbHt3A%3D&sa=X&ei=up4rU5GgN46ekQWI9IHADQ&ved=0CE4Q9QEwAg#facrc=_&imgdii=_&imgrc=RrcTCh-2Q1wIVM%253A%3Bv3HsCs2gN7KoaM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.wpclipart.com%252Fcamera%252Ffilm%252F35mm_Film_Roll.png%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.wpclipart.com%252Fcamera%252Ffilm%252F35mm_Film_Roll.png.html%3B600%3B239)


Keeping the idea of the old film days, to take a decent movie, that could be shown on the big screen, the sixteen millimetre (16mm) format size, at minimum, needed to be used; thirty five millimetre (35mm) film was better.  These sixteen and thirty five millimetre cameras were large and expensive items and therefore not regularly used.




Picture 3. Good quality 35mm film movie camera of the old days.
(https://www.google.com.au/search?q=35mm+movie+camera&espv=210&es_sm=93&tbm=isch&imgil=pDsDem99ZymuFM%253A%253Bhttps%253A%252F%252Fencrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com%252Fimages%253Fq%253Dtbn%253AANd9GcQ4wLw3afxVuMp1hSxyI1RctZupNp1_qLk-svr9pne0dfKnZEh7Fg%253B500%253B492%253BSlnn35Jd7AzS1M%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fpetapixel.com%25252F2011%25252F12%25252F07%25252Fstar-wars-movie-camera-auctioned-for-a-record-setting-625000%25252F&source=iu&usg=__KCp6HwotAT_XUxs_HU1yG7yCmRM%3D&sa=X&ei=-YArU7mhJNKbiQfkp4CIDA&ved=0CEIQ9QEwBA#facrc=_&imgdii=_&imgrc=pDsDem99ZymuFM%253A%3BSlnn35Jd7AzS1M%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fpetapixel.com%252Fassets%252Fuploads%252F2011%252F12%252Fstarwars_mini.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fpetapixel.com%252F2011%252F12%252F07%252Fstar-wars-movie-camera-auctioned-for-a-record-setting-625000%252F%3B500%3B492)


Photos and Video. In modern times, digital photos also have the advantage of small data size so that they can be shared easily through the web, email, and even stored on ones computer.  The photos used in this blog have been down-sized using software so they load quickly and do not cost much of your download limit. Many computer users have download limits on their web service; a recent experience for me was some video footage I wanted off a friend -- I had to personally visit them with a USB storage device ("stick") and load the video as the file was too large to be sent on email.     Still photos can also be used in slide presentations easier than video, and most of the presentations I have experienced, in the modern-age of computer delivery, have been slide shows.  





Video.  Movies, such as documentaries, are also a good source of multimedia delivery; it is certainly a relaxed way to absorb something.   With modern movie-making programs a movie can also be made out of a set of still photographs with narration.  My impression from the Stransbury article (part of the required reading this week), however, leads me to believe it only puts learning into the short term memory.  I have watched many documentaries in my time and I have trouble recounting the specific figures quoted in them; this is likely due to the fast pace that these facts come at you in a film where-as in a still format one can take time to absorb the information.  There is also the problem of ‘attention blink’ stated in Stransbury (2008) where concentration is lost for a second or two and the student loses the story line.  This is improved, however, when viewing on the computer: one can stop the video and wind it back a bit.  The way a video or movie is crafted makes a difference in absorbing the material.  Sesame Street, an American children’s education TV show, uses association to pair entertaining images and names to help children memorize the letters and numerals(Schwartz, Heartman (date unknown)).  An analogy can also be used to help people understand; for example, "the trade winds are like rivers in an ocean of air" (Schwartz, Heartman (date unknown)).  It has been mentioned in the readings for this week that exposure to violence in entertainment movies and computer games could be a cause of concern to younger people;  it is not the intention of this blog to unpack this problem but to rather acknowledge it exists as a concern.


Picture 4.  GoPro cameras are the new way to record your activity.  They mount on chest, on helmets, dashboards of cars, and many other places. 
(https://www.google.com.au/urlsa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CDoQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgopro.com%2F&ei=hvMrU-ieBcbDkwXO2oCABw&usg=AFQjCNF_k7eKDmlny5zW9cpg5qELy2wCnw&sig2=xiIRyplK2RM-oYhdKX5KAg&bvm=bv.62922401,d.dGI)



Commentary or interpretation is a powerful way to supplement video, as is often the case with news magazines and sports broadcasts (Schwartz, Heartman (date unknown)).  Schwartz and Heartman also talk of expository (explain) videos which are explicit at developing a sustained account of some set of facts, as in the case of documentaries.  It should be mentioned that Schwartz and Heartman mention that a ‘talking head’ is only a useful educational tool when students have some prior knowledge about the subject.


The video makes it possible to present a problem with a level of complexity that is too hard to match with a word problem. Film and video has long been used in sport to explain complex moves that would be otherwise a very long word piece; it is also much easier to absorb the film than to read the text.  The use of these videos before attempting a full-blown performance makes them very useful.  Here is a video of how to get back into a capsized row boat, which is something the author had to learn; it is obvious that this would be very cumbersome to describe using written word.




Video 1. Re-boarding a capsized row scull. (2:30)


In modern times video or movies can be used in a multimedia setting for Information Communications Technology..   For example, a series of films, that would otherwise not make a coherent story, can be placed on a web page, and linked with written identifying stories.


Collaborative Learning.  From the weeks course readings it is noted that one of the classroom pedagogies for using photos and video is class groups making a project and/or producing a movie.   M. Walsh’s Chapter 3, set in the course readings (I am unable to correctly reference it as the details are unknown), it was interesting to see that with adequate scaffolding, a teacher can set a project using ICT and the class will enthusiastically work on the task.  It is clear that with the use of the different types of media (spoken, written, visuals, manual) combined with the multimedia tools in ICT, that the students interest in the task was held.  Clearly literacy can mean more than the written word on paper, and this article shows that is true.  The chapter used for the reading clearly shows what we Graduate Diploma in Learning and Teaching students have been taught in class, that is: the teacher as a facilitator to the learning and provide students with tasks that are just beyond their reach.  It was good to hear of this success story, but I wonder if it would work in every class; specifically the troubled ones.  I am wondering if much of our learning is based on the elite students.




*Pedagogy is More Important than the Multimedia Used*

Benefits of ICT in Classroom.  Stansbury’s 2008 article in eSchool News (part of this weeks readings) shows that using multimedia improves learning compared to text-book style of learning.  Her article states that non-interactive multimodal learning increased by twenty-one percent compared to book learning.  Interactive multimodal learning increased by a lesser amount, nine percent.  When multimodal learning is mixed with higher-order thinking learning gains increased by thirty-two percent compared to book learning.  Stansbury noted that it is important to scaffold the learning to have attention and motivation of the learner.  She also noted that pedagogy is more important than the media used.

Conclusion. From the readings it is clear that students can learn better with ICT. It is also clear that the role of the teacher has not been superseded, we are still required to provide scaffolding at a minimum. Videos, photos, and podcasts (podcasts not explored in this blog) have an expanding future in teaching. In cases where classes are flipped, they are of increasing importance. With increased learning gains, the future of computers used for multimedia is secure.


D. Schwartz, K. Hartman (date unknown), It Is Not Television Anymore: Designing Digital Video for Learning and Assessment, School of Education, Stanford University.



Meris Stansbury, (2008), Analysis: How Multimedia Can Improve Your Learning, eSchool News, March 26, 2008.


Author’s note: the correct referencing information for this article is unknown.
M. Walsh, Chapter 3, Pedagogic Potentials of Multimodal Literacy, (http://www.acu.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/195676/Chapter_3_Multimodal_Literacy_M_Walsh.pdf)


Thursday 13 March 2014

Reflection 2 Week 3

ICT for Learning Design Week 3 Reflection 2


This week we students of the Graduate Diploma of Learning and Teaching are asked to provide reflections on three forms of Information Technology tools.  They are:   Blog;  Wiki;  and   Woodle.  Provided is a short description of each.  One will be considered the best tool and that will be: the wiki.


(Note to marker: a voki was tried here to introduce but I cannot get it working. Further instruction will be needed next tutorial.)


ICT Tools Advantages

Below is a concept map for a SAMR model showing why ICT tools are good for learning.



SAMR Wk3R2.jpg



Figure 1.  SAMR model for use of ICT in education.




Blogs  

Blogs are log entries (a shortening of the words web log) and have similar features to web-pages.  The concept is that they regularly have new information put to them in separate postings.  They are like web-pages because only one person puts new posts on them, like a webmaster would to a web page, in the form of a diary entry, and only that person can edit them.  Others are allowed to post comments.  They can have all sorts of multimedia added to them, such as videos either uploaded or embedded from a site like youtube or flicker; vokie’s or Foley devices; rolling ticker banners; pictures; links to other pages; audio; robots; tables; charts; etc.  Basically everything that has been seen on a web-page can be provided in a blog.     


  • They are a good learning tool to share information with groups of people.  They can be used for research tasks, for example, where someone is exploring a subject and/or needs to update a group on a regular basis.  They go live straight away.
  • They are useful for supporting Behaviourist (Hammond, et al, 2001) theory where someone is learning facts can express them in their own words and can get positive feedback from their peers or the teacher.  
  • They can delve into Cognitivism by having a blog as a means of using the information so that it can be transferred into long term memory as well as use of learning tools (shown later this blog) within the blog.


They fall short in the learning spectrum by
  • Not interactive
  • Not supporting Social Constructivism (Hammond, et al, 2001).



*Good old fashioned Web-Sites and Forums are still a good source of learning*

Web-Sites and Weebly

Web-Sites are a very good source of learning.  The internet is populated by Web-Sites where people, not just students, learn about things.  Web-Sites best fit Behaviourist theory of learning (Hammond, et al, 2001), a lower order of education, and there is nothing wrong with that.  They are a good means of researching a topic.  Web-sites are unable to be updated by the viewer and usually do not change much over long periods of time, sometimes up to a year; and sometimes the changes are minor.  One can say that some web-sites do have some interaction with their “Shopping Carts” that are on sites where they are selling, or answering of questions/quiz through means of ‘radio buttons’, etc.; however the user is unable to contribute or edit the site.  This make them considered a generally more solid form of information to use in a reference where-as a wiki, for example, is considered a weak form of reference due-to anyone being able to edit them: the information has the authority of the web-master/author.They can have all the types of media added to them as has been mentioned for the blog: videos, banners, robots, pictures, audio, links. On sites such as Jonnos's Science, a science web-site aimed for about grade 7, http://www.johnnosscience.com/biology-videos.html) the site can be used as a learning tool by a student: they can be given free time in a class to peruse Jonno's Science web-site how they like; it is also a resource for teachers.

Weebly is a web-site tool for creating sites. It can also be a forum on a website. Forums are a very good source of socializing a topic. My experience with forums are that I have been addicted to them. They usually work by a question being placed in text format. Once you or a student makes a response it is almost an irresistible feeling to check on the post and see what others have put down after you. It is even additive to see what questions your like-minded peers are putting on the forum. It is a good way to "nut-out" a problem. Unfortunately, I have seen forums where it is like the saying "The Blind leading the blind"; they lack scaffolding techniques and one always hopes the known regular poster, who is considered an expert on the subject, makes a post on your question. It is open to, like the Blog and wiki, malicious comments and therefore the moderator needs to keep a close eye on the posts.


Wk3R2 newspaper.jpg

Wiki

A Wiki site allows for interaction.  Wiki are an important tool for education as they support theories of Social Constructivism (Hammond, et al, 2001), which is the higher order of learning that we as teachers are supposed to support.  It allows teachers to push students just beyond the range of existing experience with assistance from the teacher.  It allows for discourse and cooperative learning in the classroom.  In this way it extends the learning ideas of Piaget and Vygotsky (Hammond, et al, 2001) where the student are in charge of their own learning and the teacher is merely a guide for them.  Visitors (students) are able to edit and contribute to the site.  Links to other wiki pages are possible which extends the usefulness of the interactive wiki.  


With wiki pages the teacher is able to provide the following sample of interactive scaffolding techniques:
  • PMI (Positive, Minus, Implications)
  • de Bono Six Hat
  • Collaborative authoring
  • SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunities, Threats)
  • Ranking Tool (Everyone ranks a series of ideas)
  • Tchart (paired descriptors are discussed)
  • Compare and Contrast Chart (Difference between descriptors 1 & 2, Similarities between 1 & 2).
Wiki's fall short in one area, they are open to malicious people editing the site.  The author of the wiki needs to therefore be aware of their audience and keep a close monitoring of the site.  They have other technical difficulties such as only one person can edit at one time because they can save over (and therefore delete) another's addition to the site.  However as a tool of use in the modern education sector, they provide the best means of learning.




L-D Hammond,K Austin, S Orcutt, J Rosso, (2001) How People Learn: An Introduction to Learning Theories, Episode 1, The Learning Classroom: Theory Into Practice, A Telecourse for Teacher Education and Professional Development, Stanford University School of Education.  (http://moodle.cqu.edu.au/course/view.php?name=EDED20456_2141)